DNA testing has ended the century-old claim that a Hawaiian arrow was carved from the bone of 18th-Century British explorer Captain James Cook.
The arrow, given to the Australian Museum in Sydney in the 1890s, has been accompanied by the legend since 1824.
But DNA testing by laboratories in New Zealand and Australia has revealed it was probably made from animal antler.
The arrow will stay on show in the museum - and Cook fans remain sure part of his remains will turn up one day.
Clubbed and stabbed
The arrow forms a part of the exhibition "Uncovered: Treasures of the Australian Museum", which includes a feather cape presented to Cook by Hawaiian King Kalani'opu'u in 1778.
The museum's collection manager Jude Philp confirmed on Thursday: "There is no Cook in the Australian Museum."
Cook, one of Britain's great explorers, is credited with discovering the 'Great South Land' - now Australia - in 1770.
The Yorkshire-born explorer's travels ended when he was clubbed and stabbed to death by a crowd of more than 1,000 warriors in the Sandwich Islands, now Hawaii, in 1779.
The legend of Cook's arrow began 45 years later when Hawaiian King Kamehameha, on his deathbed, gave the arrow to a relative of Cook's wife, William Adams.
The king told Mr Adams, a London surgeon, that it had been carved from Cook's bone after the skirmish with the Sandwich Islanders.
Cook's fans refuse to give up hope that at least one legend about him will prove to be true.
They believe part of his remains will be uncovered, claiming they have evidence not all of Cook's body was buried at sea in February 1779.
Cliff Thornton, president of the UK's Captain Cook Society, said: "On this occasion technology has won.
"But I am sure one of these days... one of the Cook legends will (prove) to be true and it will happen one day."
Posted by thinkum at April 29, 2004 01:16 PMModern science disclaims any intention of understanding the hidden nature of things; its philosophy condemns any such endeavour as vague, misleading and altogether unscientific....But I refuse to heed this warning. I agree that the process of understanding leads beyond - indeed far beyond - what a strict empiricism regards as the domain of legitimate knowledge; but I reject such an empiricism. If consistently applied, it would discredit any knowledge whatever and it can be upheld only by allowing it to remain inconsistent. It is permitted this inconsistency because its ruthless mutilation of human experience lends it such a high reputation for scientific severity, that its prestige overrides the defensiveness of its own foundations. Our acknowledgement of understanding as a valid form of knowing will go a long way towards liberating our minds from this violent and inefficient despotism. by free online poker
Posted by: free online poker at December 25, 2004 07:01 PMwsop - online poker sites, empirepoker | poker rules - wsop, poker chips | poker tips - poker books, WPT | poker - poker online, poker tables | internet poker - pacific poker, texas holdem | free poker online - texas holdem, poker tournaments | partypoker - free online poker, poker rooms | poker chips - world series of poker, poker chips | WPT - poker chips, poker stars | poker tournaments - partypoker, online poker rooms | free poker online - internet poker, texas hold'em poker | party poker - paradise poker, poker rules | poker tables - poker supplies, online poker | empire poker - texas holdem poker, paradise poker | poker rooms - empire poker, poker stars | empire poker - free online poker, poker stars | poker supplies - poker tournaments, pacific poker | texas hold'em - free poker online, paradise poker
Posted by: online poker at February 16, 2005 11:05 PM