August 11, 2004

Canadian attempt to fly human-powered chopper grounded

VANCOUVER - A group of students from the University of British Columbia tried to soar in a human-powered helicopter on Tuesday but they failed to become airborne.

The group was trying to be the first to launch the helicopter to win an international competition testing human-powered flight.

The team spent six years trying to build their aircraft, which resembles a model of a prehistoric bird built by the Wright Brothers.

Two giant rotors, with wing spans as wide as a Boeing 737, sit atop a tiny seat with bicycle pedals.

Under the rules, the pilot, who was a cyclist, attempted to get off the ground and hover for one minute at a height of three metres.

Unstable air conditions kept him grounded on the first attempt. The rotors smashed into one another. Two tries later, the bike chain popped off and the team called it quits for the day.

"If we get off the ground, that is a huge success," said team leader Mike Georgallis of the Thunderbird Project. "If we go past 20 seconds, it is an even bigger success. If we do the three-metre mark for a minute, I will be crying."

The dream is more than 500 years old. Leonardo da Vinci sketched the concept of a human-powered helicopter in the 15th century.

The official challenge was launched in 1980, when the American Helicopter Association promised $20,000 US to anyone who could meet their rules.

So far, the world record is held by a Japanese team, who rose about 46 centimetres and hovered for 19.5 seconds.

The UBC students say they'll make another attempt on Wednesday.


[original article]

Posted by thinkum at August 11, 2004 01:37 PM
Comments

The issues with respect to both relativism and the importance of sociological influences on science might be encapsulated by asking if one could have had a different science if historical conditions had differed... To the relativists the answer must presumably be 'yes', but then the onus is on them to demonstrate the validity of their position. To me, the answer is an unequivocal 'no': the course of science would have been very different, but the ideas would have ended up the same. by online poker

Posted by: online poker at December 27, 2004 12:58 PM

internet poker - poker stars, poker supplies | online poker rooms - partypoker, free poker online | texas hold'em poker - poker rooms, texas holdem | internet poker - poker books, poker rules | empirepoker - WPT, world series of poker | online poker - pacific poker, poker chips | poker games - poker tournaments, texas hold'em poker | paradise poker - free online poker, poker stars | poker stars - free online poker, partypoker | poker chips - texas holdem, poker chips | poker chips - wsop, empire poker | party poker - poker games, poker chips | online poker - poker books, poker online | poker stars - pacific poker, poker chips | WPT - poker supplies, paradise poker | world poker tour - empirepoker, texas hold'em poker | pacific poker - texas holdem poker, pacific poker | paradise poker - world poker tour, online poker rooms

Posted by: wsop at February 17, 2005 06:55 AM